[AXIOPRISM LENS PROMPT STARTS HERE]

"Apply Axioprism: Spectral Value Theory (full theory logic available at AxioPrism.com) to the situation described below.

Use the Axioprism framework that evaluates decisions across the three value spectrums:

• Time – Nēram  நேரம்  =  an individuals TIME, including personal knowledge or skills (their focus or attention)
• People – Kazoku  家族  =  access to PEOPLE by communication, credibility or connection (their status & recognition)
• Resources – Mūlya  मूल्य  =  control of RESOURCE, liquid or liquidatable equity at market value. (money/property)

Your task is to map the issue onto these three spectrums and help identify the hidden tradeoffs involved in the decision.

Format the analysis exactly as follows:

For each spectrum, produce:

A heading with the overarching decision question relevant to that spectrum.

A section titled ‘Metrics to consider (least obvious → most obvious)’.

Under that section, provide a bullet list of progressively more obvious impacts, starting with subtle psychological/systemic effects and ending with the most direct or visible consequences.

Each bullet point should be framed as a metric or factor to evaluate, not advice.

Structure the output like this:

⏳ Time: Nēram  நேரம்

Overarching question: [time-based decision question]

Metrics to consider (least obvious → most obvious):

…

…

…

👥 People: Kazoku  家族

Overarching question: [people/relationship access question]

Metrics to consider (least obvious → most obvious):

…

…

…

🧰 Resources: Mūlya  मूल्य

Overarching question: [capacity / logistical question]

Metrics to consider (least obvious → most obvious):

…

…

…

End with a short ‘Decision Lens’ sentence summarizing the core Axioprism insight:
The decision should be evaluated as a trade of access to time, relational space, and resources, not simply a binary choice.

Keep the analysis concise, neutral, and reflective rather than prescriptive."

[END AXIOPRISM LENS PROMPT]